Sour Grapes
Of course we're Fair and Balanced!

2004-04-13

Cost per soldier



Whoops! I badly misread Mark's post. He's suggesting a $2,500 per year for soldiers in a reconstituted Iraqi army, which is actually an excellent suggestion. Below is what I originally posted, which may be of interest to someone at some time (and so all the world can see my mistake—that's what I get for reading hastily!)






Mark Kleiman wonders why be cheap about sending more troops to Iraq. Assuming a cost per soldier of $2,500, he figures that $250 million per 100,000 soldiers is a not much of a price to pay. Ignoring the fact that the real price has nothing to do with dollars and cents, I think he's underestimating the cost of a soldier. Off the top of my head, I estimated that it's got to be at least $50,000 per soldier. I did a Google search and found data indicating that during World War II, when a candy bar sold for 5¢ (vs $2.25 in 1996), soldiers cost about $7,000 a year and that, today, each one costs about $67,000 a year. So 100,000 soldiers would be more like $6.7 billion. Still a relatively small portion of the $100 billion we're likely to spend this year, but lots more than $250 million.



Yes, I know the marginal cost of sending one troop to Iraq is not $67,000. But it's got to cost $2,500 just to fly one there and back, let alone provide the appropriate equipment (assuming we're going to do that from now on).



Blog home
Blog archives
         2003
         2004
         2005
         2006
         2007
         2008
         2009
         2010
         2011
         2012
         2013