|
|||
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by Blogger, SDF, my employer or my family, but they should be.
Blogs and such
e-mail lists
Other Results of 2 Nov 2004 General Election (winners in bold; click on office for more detail)
Tools |
2004-09-29
Europe's and US's different approaches to terror Since shortly after 11 Sep 2001, I have believed — and said — that the Bush administration has done a great service to terrorists by elevating them to a status worthy of the world's sole remaining superpower conducting war against them. The International Law Dictionary defines war as
A sustained struggle of a scale and duration that threatens the existence of the government of a state or an equivalent juridical person and that is waged between groups of forces that are armed, wear a distinctive insignia, and are subject to military discipline under a responsible command. Okay, it could be argued that this is an outdated definition that needs to be rethought. I'm all in favor of rethinking. But after reading this article from the Boston Globe [pointed to by Dave Farber], I think I'd rather rethink our approach to terrorists rather than rethink our definition of war.
I recommend reading the whole article.
Justice (Civil Liberties, so-called Intellectual Property, Privacy & Secrecy); Politics & Government (International, National, State, Local); Humor (Irony & the Funny or Unusual); Science & Technology (Astronomy, Computers, the Internet, e-Voting, Crypto, Physics & Space); Communication (Books, Film, Media, Music & the English Language); Economics (Corporatism & Consumerism); and Items of Purely Personal Note (including Genealogy, Photography, Religion & Spirituality). |